查看单个帖子
旧 2010-09-13, 01:36     #22
printforfun printforfun 当前离线
见习会员
等级: 小兄弟
级别:0 | 在线时长:1小时 | 升级还需:4小时
 
Uid: 184342
注册日期: 2010-09-13, 01:01
帖子: 1
感谢: 0
1 个帖子获得 1 次感谢
声望: 10 printforfun 向着好的方向发展
printforfun printforfun 当前离线
见习会员
等级: 小兄弟
级别:0 | 在线时长:1小时 | 升级还需:4小时
 
Uid: 184342
注册日期: 2010-09-13, 01:01
帖子: 1
感谢: 0
1 个帖子获得 1 次感谢
声望: 10 printforfun 向着好的方向发展
默认

Hello to everyone!

I just read this topic and it's very interesting but I think it's not so clear viewing it by pratical means..

I don't know if the information I will give can be usefull but I'll try! :)

I own two spectro,

1 is a UV cut X-rite I-one.
2 Is a non UV cut I-one

Using a UV-cut spectro is necessary if the support where you print the patch for linearization or calibration purpose has too much UV reflecting coat.

I also have a Wood lamp to test for paper or print support in general.

If it's shine I use a UV cut X-rite I-one

If I try to make a calibration with a non UV cut spectro with a paper that reflects too much UV light I have a color space not as big as I use the UV cut spectro..

This is because the Uv component of the light that the media reflects is red by the spectro and get a false value.. ( The spectro read an higher bightness that the real brightness)
printforfun 当前离线  
右列会员因为此帖价值甚高向 printforfun 表示感谢:
Bloodsaler (2010-09-13)