[xxyyzz97]

Yes, each press having its own characteristic, so an individual ICC for each press is the most perfect.
Regarding the reality to have separate ICC for each press, whether this is workable. It is depends, what is the quality is seeking for, how many presses involved, the nature of job, production control, etc. Many factors would be affecting this.
In the past, no one can imagine that the sheetfed press min. print run would be drop to a few hundred. In some research, if jobs is enough, the min. print run for a press can be as low as around 300 prints.
There is no a single way to do that, the process flow arrangement would be vary.

[xxyyzz97]

作者: Bloodsaler

不明白xxyyzz97老大说的印刷机单独的ICC曲线和印刷机可以低至几百的印刷速度之间有啥直接的关系~

Sound like not related to min. print quantity.
The link is not direct or very weak.
Why a printer can lower the min. print quantity to a few hundred? Cost.
How many jobs for a press (let said 8-up) can be done in one shift (8 hours)?
Imagine a press can done 40 jobs in one shift and the other one can only print 24 (same total print volume and same quality), and the waste (paper, ink, etc) of the 50 jobs is close to that 24 jobs. Which one's cost is lower? If the one printing 50 jobs charge at the same price of each job. Whose profit would be higher?
In this case, what we need? speed & accuracy.
From here you will find the link.